Brief biographical sketch
Professor Stephan Lewandowsky, FAcSS, FAPS
Chair in Cognitive Science
University of Bristol
Professor Stephan Lewandowsky is a cognitive scientist at the University of Bristol and the recipient of numerous awards and honours, including a Discovery Outstanding Researcher Award from the Australian Research Council, a Wolfson Research Merit Fellowship from the Royal Society, and a Humboldt Research Award from the Humboldt Foundation in Germany. He is a Fellow of the Academy of Social Science (UK) and a Fellow of the Association of Psychological Science. He was appointed a fellow of the Committee for Skeptical Inquiry for his commitment to science, rational inquiry and public education.
His research examines people’s memory, decision making, and knowledge structures, with a particular emphasis on how people update their memories if information they believe turn out to be false. This has led him to examine the persistence of misinformation and spread of “fake news” in society, including conspiracy theories. He is particularly interested in the variables that determine whether or not people accept scientific evidence, for example surrounding vaccinations or climate science.
He has published more than 240 scholarly articles, chapters, and books. His research regularly appears in journals such as Nature Human Behaviour, Nature Communications, and Psychological Review.
(See www.cogsciwa.com for a complete list of scientific publications.)
His research is currently funded by the European Research Council, the EU’s Horizon 2020 programme, and the Volkswagen Foundation. Professor Lewandowsky also frequently appears in print and broadcast media and has contributed nearly 100 opinion pieces to the global media.
(Updated 6 August 2022)
Brief first-person sketch
I am a cognitive scientist with an interest in how people update their memories if information they believe turns out to be false. This has led me to examine the persistence of misinformation and spread of “fake news” in society, including conspiracy theories. I have become particularly interested in the variables that determine whether or not people accept scientific evidence, for example surrounding vaccinations or climate science. Because my research speaks to important contemporary events, I contribute to public debate through opinion pieces in the media and public engagement.
(Updated 24 February 2022)